2011 05 01 tweets
Replying to @wgthomas3
Thank you! I'm quite excited about it.
Sun May 01 19:50:06 +0000 2011
Just back from fantastic brunch at the Brooklyn home of some old friends. I could once eat brunch without needing a nap after, but no more.
Sun May 01 19:52:12 +0000 2011
Folks, do you remember which study it was that ranked the reasons scholars choose their publication venues? \(Audience, prestige, etc\.\)
Sun May 01 22:43:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
Yes, that's it; thanks!
Sun May 01 22:46:09 +0000 2011
Thanks, @surlyF: it's the Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey 2009.
Sun May 01 22:46:35 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
I could see it clearly as well; I just couldn't remember where it was!
Sun May 01 22:49:58 +0000 2011
Replying to @shanakimball
**brain explodes**
Mon May 02 00:13:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @shanakimball
$8385 for a departmental license \(up to 10 users in one office\)!
Mon May 02 00:14:53 +0000 2011
Boy, do I stink at final sentences.
Mon May 02 02:18:12 +0000 2011
Replying to @Ed_Raso
Maybe that is how I should end the article!
Mon May 02 02:22:26 +0000 2011
Any bets on what we're not going to be allowed to carry on airplanes tomorrow? #nationalsecurityannouncement
Mon May 02 02:23:41 +0000 2011
Okay, I have now turned on my television for the first time since the Oscars. Please don't make me listed to Wolf Blitzer for long.
Mon May 02 02:29:06 +0000 2011
Listen, that is. But you get the point.
Mon May 02 02:29:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
No kidding.
Mon May 02 02:30:32 +0000 2011
Oy, with the speculating. I wouldn't want to speculate, but there's been a lot of speculation. As has been widely speculated.
Mon May 02 02:31:35 +0000 2011
Replying to @jmittell
I know, right. The set in my apt this year is awful enough I'd rather download & watch on my computer.
Mon May 02 02:32:27 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
I still have very fond memories of Wolf from Gulf War I. But he's a shadow of that rugged former self, alas.
Mon May 02 02:33:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Oh, man, you and me both.
Mon May 02 02:34:54 +0000 2011
The White House is saying that I have behaved SO responsibly by not speculating. Other Twitterers are wildly speculating, but not me.
Mon May 02 02:37:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
As long as I have multiple sources to go with this. The world will know very soon.
Mon May 02 02:39:03 +0000 2011
John King, on the other hand, not so much afraid of the speculating. Poor Wolf!
Mon May 02 02:44:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
So curious about the choice to let John King say it and keep Wolf Blitzer pure...
Mon May 02 02:45:01 +0000 2011
And now Wolf gets to say it out loud? What's that all about?
Mon May 02 02:45:52 +0000 2011
Yeah, I'm not sure I'm going to remember that I was sitting in front of my computer when John King announced that Osama bin Laden was dead.
Mon May 02 02:47:44 +0000 2011
Wolf apparently pretty upset about having his evening interrupted.
Mon May 02 02:50:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @budtheteacher
You are not kidding.
Mon May 02 02:50:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @jeanburgess
I know, right. A little spoiler alert might have been nice.
Mon May 02 02:51:08 +0000 2011
Poor Barack. He's now going to come in and say "look, forget it. It was gonna be a surprise, but it's ruined now."
Mon May 02 02:53:24 +0000 2011
Ah, Wolf. They must already be plotting retaliation -- because CNN must have something to freak us out about.
Mon May 02 02:55:14 +0000 2011
So is this a lot of Blackberry product placement on CNN, or what?
Mon May 02 03:00:40 +0000 2011
Replying to @jeanburgess
Indeed.
Mon May 02 03:02:17 +0000 2011
Actionable: John King, I do not think that word means exactly what you think it means.
Mon May 02 03:07:27 +0000 2011
CNN may be infuriating, but at least they're surreal.
Mon May 02 03:08:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @hollykruse
This is true.
Mon May 02 03:09:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @hollykruse
True. And I should probably switch. But it's like watching a slow-motion car crash. I'm horrified, but I can't quite turn away.
Mon May 02 03:12:19 +0000 2011
RT @McLemee: It sure seems like Obama's job as secret Muslim operative imposing Sharia law on the US just got a whole lot harder.
Mon May 02 03:12:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Indeed. He needs a much better stage manager.
Mon May 02 03:21:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @jasonrhody and @mlaconvention
Absolutely - but those contacts should have happened before the announcement. Really badly mistimed.
Mon May 02 03:24:46 +0000 2011
RT @maddow: A huge night for the country and the world, but particularly for post-9/11 US military vets and intelligence personnel.
Mon May 02 03:25:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @jasonrhody and @mlaconvention
Wolf had some weird story about Obama being out somewhere this morning and getting called back to the WH...
Mon May 02 03:26:29 +0000 2011
Dude, if the New York Times has already published it, this announcement has taken too long. http://nyti.ms/ldiAZg
Mon May 02 03:28:06 +0000 2011
Apparently the Fox News crawl says that "Obama Bin Laden" is dead. Nice.
Mon May 02 03:33:11 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Friend posted a shot of it on FB.
Mon May 02 03:34:15 +0000 2011
RT @acavender: I can't say I'm sorry to see him gone. But celebration doesn't sit right either. A necessary evil may be the best descrip ...
Mon May 02 03:39:27 +0000 2011
RT @CapitolClio: Thank you Mr. President for not turning announcement into a xenophobic pep rally.
Mon May 02 03:46:18 +0000 2011
Replying to @jeanburgess and @katecrawford
NYT's "how it leaked" story: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/how-the-osama-announcement-leaked-out/
Mon May 02 03:49:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @jeanburgess
Me too.
Mon May 02 03:51:05 +0000 2011
Okay, horrible television turned off again. Feeling better already.
Mon May 02 03:52:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention and @cjprender
Oy. I had to shut it off about 5 mins ago.
Mon May 02 03:59:00 +0000 2011
You know, I never did finish writing that last sentence. Dammit.
Mon May 02 04:06:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @roxieblog
Friend of mine standing in an airport not long after 9/11, next to a guy staring at news reports showing ground zero. Guy shook +
Mon May 02 04:20:26 +0000 2011
Replying to @roxieblog
his head and said "First Dale [Earnhardt], and now this."
Mon May 02 04:21:14 +0000 2011
RT @NYCAviation: RT @NBCNewYork: Added checkpoints and patrols tomorrow in NYC by FBI and NYPD, per @Jonathan4NY.
Mon May 02 04:22:36 +0000 2011
Alright folks. I do have the MLA Program Committee starting tomorrow at 9, so I'm off to force myself to sleep.
Mon May 02 04:29:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @jasonaboyd
Thanks! I'm looking forward to getting started!
Mon May 02 13:42:47 +0000 2011
RT @FordhamDH: Thrilled that @kfitz will be keynoting for Fac Tech Day ... http://fordhamdh.blogspot.com/2011/05/noted-digital-scholar-kathleen.html?spref=tw
Mon May 02 15:31:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @cjprender
I have a longstanding argument that Irish + Italian is as close to Jewish as one can get.
Mon May 02 16:04:17 +0000 2011
MLA Program Committee meeting, day 1, now done. A long and exhausting day, but it'll pay off wonderfully in January!
Tue May 03 01:48:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Um. Wow. Closer than I thought, but still no cigar.
Tue May 03 02:23:36 +0000 2011
Replying to @CaseyBrienza
Thanks for the link; I'll look forward to pondering the possibilities!
Tue May 03 19:50:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @BendProf
Will look forward to seeing you on the committee next year!
Tue May 03 21:04:51 +0000 2011
Replying to @BendProf
We will make a point of it.
Tue May 03 21:08:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @CaseyBrienza
Oh, excellent!
Tue May 03 21:08:39 +0000 2011
RT @mlaconvention: Att #MLA members: go to mla.org, take 5 mins to read proposed amenmnt + resolution, then vote. It's impt that a great ...
Tue May 03 21:39:02 +0000 2011
Unbelievable. Lufthansa just refunded the full purchase price on our Dublin-Prague tickets \(which were undone by the European blizzard\).
Tue May 03 22:26:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @moncia
Ooh, I hadn't thought of it that way!
Tue May 03 22:33:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
I'm amazed. I assumed they'd come up with some cancellation fee that would eliminate any refund...
Tue May 03 22:33:39 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself
No kidding.
Tue May 03 22:33:51 +0000 2011
Hey, folks! So, totally hypothetically: say you've been tweeting both professionally and personally for several years now. +
Wed May 04 00:06:58 +0000 2011
& say you take a job working for a very public organization & you *know* that your tweets will be taken by some as the Voice of the Org. +
Wed May 04 00:09:47 +0000 2011
Do you start a new "org" account, or a new private account? Do you eliminate the personal from your tweeting? Do you handle some other way?
Wed May 04 00:10:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @Ed_Raso
Ha!
Wed May 04 00:13:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself
That's more or less what I'm thinking. Though there are a number of tweeps who might be around due to the new position...
Wed May 04 00:19:06 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself
Anyhow, yes, it's obvious that everything is public, so needs to be cautious.
Wed May 04 00:19:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
That's the direction I'm leaning, I think...
Wed May 04 00:20:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @clioweb, @chnm and @scholarslab
Fair enough - caution seems in order there!
Wed May 04 00:20:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @caseyboyle
Oh, you know. One is popular on one's own account. :)
Wed May 04 00:23:03 +0000 2011
Replying to @Ed_Raso
Hmmm. Good point.
Wed May 04 00:23:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen and @sheepeeh
Oh, this is my own scruples, not the hypothetical org's.
Wed May 04 00:25:34 +0000 2011
FYI, this is really my own worry & not the org's. And I don't worry about much, except perhaps the occasional rant about a certain novelist.
Wed May 04 00:27:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen
Oy. I can only imagine.
Wed May 04 00:28:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen
That is a very good point.
Wed May 04 00:29:21 +0000 2011
A social media policy that, to quote @nowviskie, boils down to "We're all grown-ups here. Just don't be stupid" sounds like a good thing.
Wed May 04 00:34:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
Nice! Though I'm way less worried about the org claiming I'm representing them than a publication thinking I am.
Wed May 04 00:36:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @pmhswe
That's a huge part of why I went to Twitter with the question. Research!
Wed May 04 00:42:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @roxieblog
Thanks, on both counts!
Wed May 04 00:43:06 +0000 2011
Thanks for the insight, all. I was quite curious what the thinking out there was. Seems a fair division between maintaining one acct & +
Wed May 04 00:56:16 +0000 2011
starting a new org account, while keeping the current account as "me."
Wed May 04 00:57:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @karikraus
You are too kind!
Wed May 04 00:59:01 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen
Don't tempt me!
Wed May 04 00:59:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @tcarmody and @dancohen
Will start swearing like a sailor posthaste. But do you read the consensus as sticking solely with @kfitz, or +
Wed May 04 01:04:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @tcarmody and @dancohen
adding an org account but keeping @kfitz alive? Seems split to me.
Wed May 04 01:04:43 +0000 2011
Replying to @jmittell
Oh, do I have a line I want to use in response!
Wed May 04 01:05:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @tcarmody and @kfitz
lives on regardless. I'm thinking that I'll just do all my tweeting, official and un-, until it seems prudent to change.
Wed May 04 01:10:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen
This is a most persuasive point.
Wed May 04 01:12:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention and @jmittell
Al? I don't remember him having opinions on students. But then he's pretty down on everyone.
Wed May 04 01:13:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie
Probably there should be a generic org acct anyhow, one not associated with, say, one's orgconvention.
Wed May 04 01:14:14 +0000 2011
Replying to @swarthmoreburke and @publishdifferentyouidiots
is the PERFECT handle.
Wed May 04 01:15:20 +0000 2011
Replying to @brettbobley
You are totally my model in this, btw. Personable, friendly & fun, and yet professional & discreet. Plus separate org acct.
Wed May 04 01:22:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @brettbobley
I certainly hope so!
Wed May 04 01:23:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @JenHoward
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Um. I mean. Hmm.
Wed May 04 01:26:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @brettbobley
Absolutely. But given the intimate \(some might say fishbowl\) environment of a SLAC, work/life blend has been long on my mind.
Wed May 04 01:42:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @JenServenti, @brettbobley and @jasonrhody
Now I'm really intrigued.
Wed May 04 01:42:27 +0000 2011
Thanks, all. A most interesting conversation. Like @pmhswe, I hope someone is doing research on personal/professional identity on Twitter!
Wed May 04 02:11:35 +0000 2011
Replying to @JenServenti and @jasonrhody
Only if they say "resistance is futile in my neighborhood" in Latin.
Wed May 04 02:16:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @jasonrhody and @jenserventi
Won't you be my federal granting agency program officer?
Wed May 04 02:30:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @patrick_mj
Ha!
Wed May 04 21:06:39 +0000 2011
So sorry not to have made it to #cunydhi tonight; had an appointment that ran too long to make it. My best to @noctambulate!
Wed May 04 23:09:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @cunydhi
Presses have collab model, but hasn't their outward field-based focus caused problems with support for the press at home? #cunydhi
Wed May 04 23:16:24 +0000 2011
.@cunydhi Exactly. Unis provide so little bc they don't see how they benefit. How to balance svc to field & uni interests? #cunydhi
Wed May 04 23:23:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @ernestopriego
Thanks so much - I'd love to see your response! And thanks for the link... I hadn't heard about it, but fascinating!
Thu May 05 18:31:35 +0000 2011
A most awesome un-NewYorky super New York day, which I'm just superstitious enough about not to post details until they're finalized.
Fri May 06 02:57:24 +0000 2011
Replying to @boone
Oh, hey! See you there this afternoon! #blsci
Fri May 06 13:50:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall and @mlaconvention
Yay! Congrats, Brian!
Fri May 06 14:21:03 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall
Ooh, excellent! I'll look forward to seeing you then.
Fri May 06 14:23:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention and @amandafrench
Ha. I'll have to tell you that story, Amanda.
Fri May 06 16:44:16 +0000 2011
RT @lwaltzer: We plan on streaming "Find a Voice & Build Community: Social Media in Business & Education" @scottkirsner @rozzy @kthread ...
Fri May 06 16:49:40 +0000 2011
Replying to @rozzy
No sense of what's up?
Fri May 06 20:36:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @jenterysayers
Congratulations, Jentery!
Sat May 07 02:05:48 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
Good grief! I'm glad you're okay! \(Where "okay" is a relative term, but still\!\)
Sat May 07 13:58:57 +0000 2011
Coming off a completely bonkers week. Have another crazy week ahead. Should be spending today revising an article, but...
Sat May 07 18:36:20 +0000 2011
Suspect I may spend the rest of the afternoon reading a novel instead.
Sat May 07 18:36:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @ncecire and @eetempleton
What I wanted to know was what you were hearing/reading that was explaining to you what an operating system is!
Sat May 07 19:39:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @ncecire
Oh. Okay, in that case. \(At least they didn't start with how to turn the computer on\.\)
Sat May 07 19:43:48 +0000 2011
Replying to @ncecire
Fascinating. I had the same experience - took an intro CS class a few years ago and found myself tripping over the oddest things.
Sat May 07 19:48:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @ncecire
That's a much more generous explanation than that of the prof, who hinted that the 40yo brain is less flexible than that at 20.
Sat May 07 20:14:50 +0000 2011
Replying to @ncecire
Exactly.
Sat May 07 20:18:18 +0000 2011
So this showed up on Amazon today: http://www.amazon.com/Planned-Obsolescence-Publishing-Technology-Academy/dp/0814727883 And somebody already likes it! I cannot tell you how happy those two things make me.
Sat May 07 23:12:04 +0000 2011
\(Incidentally, many thanks to whoever has pre\-ordered it\! Pretty amazed by its rank, given it's 5 months off\.\)
Sat May 07 23:14:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @joshhonn
:)
Sat May 07 23:15:43 +0000 2011
Replying to @westcenter
Thanks!
Sat May 07 23:25:53 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Nice!
Sat May 07 23:46:25 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
But not bad. When I first read your hashtag, I though you meant that you were having an off spring. This is better!
Sat May 07 23:54:13 +0000 2011
Replying to @TeklaSchell
Fantastic -- thanks!
Sun May 08 00:18:39 +0000 2011
Replying to @ibogost
Probably the amount of time they've spent on the freeway.
Sun May 08 01:34:45 +0000 2011
Coffee.
Sun May 08 12:10:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Nice! I'm just happy to have coffee.
Sun May 08 12:26:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie and @mlaconvention
Lovely!
Sun May 08 12:32:27 +0000 2011
So Amazon doesn't have it yet, but NYU Press has given Planned Obsolescence a cover: http://nyupress.org/books/book-details.aspx?bookId=4998
Sun May 08 12:45:50 +0000 2011
The image is from the work of Dalton Ghetti: http://kronikle.kidrobot.com/pencil-tip-micro-sculptures-by-dalton-ghetti/
Sun May 08 12:47:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself
It's possible I'm more excited about that image than the words inside.
Sun May 08 13:19:37 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
I would counter your "even if" with an "also because." Special added bonus!
Sun May 08 14:06:39 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Indubitably!
Sun May 08 14:08:44 +0000 2011
I just got ousted as the mayor of a part of Terminal C at IAH that I don't think I've ever been in. Thanks for the surrealism, foursquare!
Sun May 08 23:43:08 +0000 2011
This has been another Very Big Day. I'm going to bed before it gets any bigger.
Mon May 09 01:40:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @jbj
The birds here like to cluster in the tree right outside my window around 6am, screaming their heads off, and then dissipate by 7.
Mon May 09 10:58:14 +0000 2011
Replying to @mkirschenbaum
Both at the same time would be bad.
Mon May 09 12:45:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall
She spoke at our commencement last year. Tiny sad Minute Man protest, paired with huge DREAM Act counterprotest.
Mon May 09 12:46:39 +0000 2011
Thanks, all, for the kind words about the Chron piece! Sorry not to have responded sooner - in a distinctly non-digital seminar today.
Mon May 09 17:50:06 +0000 2011
RT @nowviskie: Major congrats to @mandellc on appointment as dir of Texas A&M's Institute for Digital Humanities, Media and Culture! //Yay!!
Mon May 09 18:04:18 +0000 2011
@mandellc Huge congratulations!
Mon May 09 18:04:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @manovich and @dancohen
Are you reifying the theory/practice divide? :)
Mon May 09 19:49:36 +0000 2011
Replying to @jcmeloni
Finally getting to read through the stream. You are the best.
Mon May 09 20:01:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @manovich and @dancohen
Actually, that piece points out an assumed divide and suggests bridging it!
Mon May 09 20:53:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @Scrivenings
I'm so sorry - will keep your family in my thoughts.
Mon May 09 22:19:15 +0000 2011
My next trick will be figuring out how to make the paper version of the New Yorker stop showing up.
Tue May 10 00:36:08 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
I would not hold my breath on that. But it is an awfully nice interface.
Tue May 10 00:47:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mattbucher
That may be the most demented thing I've ever read.
Tue May 10 01:39:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Happy to do so!
Tue May 10 01:59:58 +0000 2011
Replying to @eetempleton and @samplereality
They tend to do things like "reëducation." Here's a blog post about it! http://www.betalogue.com/2003/11/27/umlauts-in-ithe-new-yorkeri/
Tue May 10 02:18:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention, @eetempleton and @samplereality
It's like you have a word for *everything*!
Tue May 10 02:25:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Sending you super-good thoughts...
Tue May 10 10:30:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @GeorgeOnline
Do not get me started on their completely borked subscription engine. Grrr indeed.
Tue May 10 12:56:26 +0000 2011
Huge congrats, @jdrouin!
Tue May 10 14:43:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @roxieblog
I went for a long stretch with someone from DOJ reading my blog. Turned out to be a former student who worked there. Whew.
Wed May 11 01:23:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention and @roxieblog
You can get pretty detailed info from most stats services, yeah. You leave digital fingerprints everywhere you go.
Wed May 11 01:26:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @BendProf, @roxieblog and @mlaconvention
Google Reader will give you info about how many subscribers you have, but nothing more, I think.
Wed May 11 01:39:35 +0000 2011
Replying to @dougreside and @mlaconvention
There are other stats packages, some native to blogging services. Not everybody reads them, though.
Wed May 11 01:41:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @dougreside
True, though Statcounter gives more detailed info for IPs that are assigned to known entities. Hence spotting the DOJ reader!
Wed May 11 01:47:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen and @jenhoward
I've always taken it to mean that the author isn't automatically licensing such uses, but it's still possible to ask.
Wed May 11 01:49:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen and @jenhoward
Which throws a wrench into things, yes, but doesn't preclude such uses entirely. Am I misunderstanding?
Wed May 11 01:50:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen and @jenhoward
I'm still torn on this. I think I'd approve most commercial reuse, but I can imagine some I'd want to restrict.
Wed May 11 02:12:25 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen and @jenhoward
I'm probably wrong about it, but there's something in completely letting go of all commercial reuse that unsettles me.
Wed May 11 02:13:37 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
It's only corporations that want to exploit the reusable commons for their own gain that I want to make ask me first.
Wed May 11 02:27:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen, @mkgold and @jenhoward
Fair enough. I'd just like a line somewhere between scholarly reuse and corporate exploitation.
Wed May 11 02:34:58 +0000 2011
Replying to @dancohen, @mkgold and @jenhoward
Not that any corporate exploiters are likely to be after my stuff.
Wed May 11 02:35:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
But it's not diminishing the commons if it's there for commons-oriented uses.
Wed May 11 02:36:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
I hear you. And as I said several times already, I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong. But I'm not comfortable with the +
Wed May 11 02:38:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
suggestion that the only way to build the commons requires allowing all commercial interests free reuse without asking.
Wed May 11 02:39:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF and @reporat
Right. The kind of thing I'd like some say over.
Wed May 11 02:40:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
Maybe all I'm after here is a "tell me first" license.
Wed May 11 02:42:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
Seriously, I'm willing to acknowledge \(again\!\) that I don't have all the answers here. I got into this because I was seriously +
Wed May 11 02:51:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @RepoRat
asking a question about why NC-SA was a problem. It's been a long and very bad day, so I'm going to quit while I'm behind.
Wed May 11 02:52:53 +0000 2011
Forget "What about Bob?" What Gmail needs is a "Hey, stupid, you were BCC'd on that message, so maybe you don't want to reply-all" function.
Wed May 11 18:00:40 +0000 2011
Replying to @twel
Congratulations - a great school in a fabulous city!
Wed May 11 18:02:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @MoodyFred
Less than it could have been; thankfully, Gmail *does* have a 30-second delay on sending, so one can undo a horrible mistake.
Wed May 11 18:05:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @terrisenft
Wow, I just saw this, too. Congrats!
Wed May 11 20:54:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @newkidonthehall and @mmwwah
Thanks, you two, for this convo! Must figure out what to do with the 50% of my books that won't fit in my apt.
Wed May 11 22:19:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
It is Obscenely Expensive and I have to go through co-op board approval. To rent. It's lovely though, and I hope I get it.
Wed May 11 22:21:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @newkidonthehall and @mmwwah
This is great to know. I need to do a major deaccession. \(Don't tell our colleagues, M\!\)
Wed May 11 22:22:26 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Will send via e.
Wed May 11 22:22:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @newkidonthehall
Thanks! I've been told that if I have the financials \(I do, barely\) and don't show up to the interview in pjs, I'll be ok.
Wed May 11 22:27:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
And how quickly will that candidate's indiscretions in a rest stop bathroom be brought to light?
Wed May 11 23:35:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie
I'm so glad you wrote this; it's helping me think more clearly through the issues \(and my lingering concerns\).
Wed May 11 23:42:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @boone
"Thank you, Internet."
Thu May 12 00:57:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
That would be fun. We could call it BaymCamp.
Thu May 12 00:57:52 +0000 2011
There is a small child outside screaming the song about the wheels on the bus going wownd and wownd. Not the usual NYC street ruckus.
Thu May 12 01:57:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @savasavasava
True. I'm in the west village, a block from Christopher. There are kids around, but not usually in the street. & not at 10pm!
Thu May 12 01:59:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @cjprender
No, just the refrain. Over and over and...
Thu May 12 03:27:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention and @cjprender
Oh, dear. Please don't.
Thu May 12 12:28:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Sheesh. Not bad!
Thu May 12 16:12:13 +0000 2011
A fascinating exploration of what other papers might learn from the @chronicle's subscription practices. http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/05/the-newsonomics-of-old-dipsy-doo/
Thu May 12 16:23:21 +0000 2011
After three highly stressful days of nonstop meetings and Getting Nothing Done, I'm having a fabulous day of working at home.
Thu May 12 16:40:19 +0000 2011
And writing! Actual sentences! Astonishing how much better that can make me feel.
Thu May 12 16:40:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @archivesnext
Indeed. It's also amazing how stressful I find a mounting to-do list involving the production of lots of sentences.
Thu May 12 16:45:53 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
I would pretty much expect so.
Thu May 12 16:57:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
No, that would be completely unexpected!
Thu May 12 17:03:42 +0000 2011
Ah, the levels of irony: Facebook "believes Google is doing some things in social networking that raise privacy concerns" and "resents +
Thu May 12 17:15:28 +0000 2011
Google’s attempts to use Facebook data in its own social-networking service." FB should check its privacy settings! http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-12/facebook-busted-in-clumsy-smear-attempt-on-google/#
Thu May 12 17:16:41 +0000 2011
Dear Op-Ed Writer, How about an article highlighting the scary blackness of Kettle? Love, your friends at the PR company representing Pot.
Thu May 12 17:21:49 +0000 2011
Okay, looming thing that must be finishing up today has now been finished up today. On to looming things numbers two and three.
Thu May 12 17:47:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @newkidonthehall
Sending you all the good moving vibes I can!
Thu May 12 18:20:48 +0000 2011
Take one thing off the to-do list; put two things on.
*sigh*
Thu May 12 19:36:04 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Is it a "16 Tons" kinda song?
Thu May 12 19:50:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Absolutely.
Thu May 12 19:56:58 +0000 2011
Acela to Boston for #MIT7. It's way too early for this.
Fri May 13 10:18:52 +0000 2011
On the up side, the train is all but empty, and the quiet car may actually stay relatively quiet.
Fri May 13 10:21:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @sherah1918 and @samplereality
Indeed. I've been thinking that since I read your post yesterday. My partner & I have been apart for most of +
Fri May 13 14:49:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @sherah1918 and @samplereality
20 years, and it's been very hard - but nothing like it would have been if there were kids involved.
Fri May 13 14:50:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @sherah1918 and @samplereality
Our stats are pretty much the opposite; we've lived together for a total of about 4 years out of 20.
Fri May 13 14:57:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Hurry up please, it's time.
Fri May 13 15:57:26 +0000 2011
Replying to @amandafrench
Whoa.
Fri May 13 17:00:02 +0000 2011
Welcoming speeches at #mit7, to be followed by opening plenary, with yours truly. Curious what I'm going to say!
Fri May 13 17:12:26 +0000 2011
I'll be here momentarily, if sans first initial. http://yfrog.com/h7v4suqj
Fri May 13 17:16:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @jmittell
That would be AWESOME.
Fri May 13 17:17:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @savasavasava
I don't think it's being streamed, alas, but it should be heavily tweeted! #mit7
Fri May 13 17:17:51 +0000 2011
Replying to @j_l_r and @d_kompare
Miss both of you! #mit7
Fri May 13 17:35:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @khellekson
Eek! Didn't mean it to come out that way.
Fri May 13 19:11:32 +0000 2011
Replying to @edmj and @scholarslab
Congratulations all around!
Fri May 13 19:55:01 +0000 2011
Replying to @hollykruse
I'm so sorry, Holly - how sad!
Fri May 13 20:01:53 +0000 2011
Replying to @jbj and @nmhouston
Ditto.
Fri May 13 20:26:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @sherah1918
Hey, congrats! So glad you'll get to keep working with @chnm.
Sat May 14 14:07:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @sherah1918
No, I'd definitely take mine over yours. We haven't gone back & forth every week, & we're both grownups about it.
Sat May 14 14:47:50 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @sherah1918
\(Literally\!\)
Sat May 14 14:47:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @sherah1918
There have been lots of hard parts, but I haven't had the sense of missing something that can't be repeated.
Sat May 14 14:49:59 +0000 2011
Now beginning "Archives and Cultural Memory" with @jasonrhody, among others. #mit7
Sat May 14 15:11:27 +0000 2011
@jasonrhody describing NEH-funded archival projects; power of/drawbacks to crowdsourced archiving initiatives. #mit7
Sat May 14 15:18:25 +0000 2011
Ah, the digital humanities/digital media question, but here applied to a changing cultural heritage. #mit7
Sat May 14 15:34:25 +0000 2011
Beginning his response, @jasonrhody notes that it's a Tupac/Biggie Smalls debate: east coast/west coast approaches to the digital. #mit7
Sat May 14 15:35:31 +0000 2011
Shoutout to @mkirschenbaum and new practices for working with digital archival materials of literary authors. #mit7
Sat May 14 15:36:55 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @jasonrhody
Seriously. Where's the Dirty South in this narrative?
Sat May 14 15:38:56 +0000 2011
I love a conference that provides lunch. Even if it did come with a napkin that I'd have found inadequate if I'd been told it was a Kleenex.
Sat May 14 17:02:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Yay!
Sun May 15 01:24:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah and @wynkenhimself
Christ. That was some crash!
Sun May 15 01:38:55 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Good lord! What turned out to have happened? \(And have some gin, please\.\)
Sun May 15 01:41:45 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Yeesh.
Sun May 15 01:43:35 +0000 2011
Slides done. Need beer. \(Phew\.\)
Sun May 15 02:35:54 +0000 2011
Koosel's argument that studying digital identity narratives is both the study of texts and of people has implications for ethics, IRB. #mit7
Sun May 15 13:28:00 +0000 2011
My session on "Publishing in Transition" is beginning in rm 325! #mit7
Sun May 15 14:50:25 +0000 2011
Hanno Biber and Evelyn Breiteneder from the Austrian Academy Corpus presenting completely awesome digital corpus interface. #mit7
Sun May 15 15:14:48 +0000 2011
Ooh, Austrian Academy Corpus produced in partnership with Anne Burdick. Should have recognized her work! #mit7 \(Was supposed to be me\!\)
Sun May 15 15:42:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @jasonrhody
You are way too kind. You left out the breathlessness in attempting to present 25 mins of material in 15. \(Didn't work\.\) #mit7
Sun May 15 15:48:32 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmmbanksy
Should have mentioned: Hocking plans to continue self-publishing some work alongside the press books. She's that prolific! #mit7
Sun May 15 15:50:30 +0000 2011
RT @jasonrhody: .@khellekson offers interesting insights based on diverse work experience w/ journals across scientific & humanities dis ...
Sun May 15 15:53:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @captain_primate
My understanding is no - Google is moving the doc sharing aspects to Docs and focusing Groups on discussion.
Sun May 15 15:58:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @captain_primate
Never mind.
Sun May 15 15:58:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @captain_primate
The doc sharing aspects were great, but I can see why they're refocusing in this upgrade.
Sun May 15 16:14:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @captain_primate
Indeed!
Sun May 15 16:35:26 +0000 2011
My presentation today was an early exploration of part of a potential new project. It's gotten me excited about it again. Thanks, #mit7!
Sun May 15 17:29:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Nope! It was about the end of the publishing industry as we know it, via case studies of JFranz & Amanda Hocking.
Sun May 15 18:16:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
You got it!
Sun May 15 18:18:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @khellekson
Thanks so much! It was great being on the panel with you, too; I'll look forward to another opportunity to talk.
Sun May 15 22:06:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @CaseyBrienza and @khellekson
Me too. Another time!
Sun May 15 22:08:11 +0000 2011
Train approaching New York. #mit7 was fabulous, and I've had a productive ride home, but I am cross-eyed with exhaustion.
Sun May 15 23:22:43 +0000 2011
The neighborhood cellist I've been hearing all year is literally playing on the corner. How did I not know that?
Mon May 16 00:08:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
I intend to! Ordering in and then climbing into bed with tv on the aypad.
Mon May 16 00:15:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Either streaming from netflicks or downloaded from aytunes or elsewhere...
Mon May 16 00:54:36 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
The cello is mighty nice by itself, but may he'd like having someone sit in!
Mon May 16 00:55:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Yeah, that flutist needs a new venue. Not my corner, though. I assume the cellist is playing for tips, but I'm not sure.
Mon May 16 01:12:50 +0000 2011
Replying to @mlaconvention
Apparently it can be, at least to some extent, if you have Time-Warner.
Mon May 16 01:43:14 +0000 2011
After a really productive weekend, I feel as if I have a grip on my to do list. No one send me anything this week, okay?
Mon May 16 12:25:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
Ouch.
Mon May 16 12:37:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
Indeed!
Mon May 16 12:38:35 +0000 2011
Heading up to Fordham shortly to speak at their Faculty Technology Day. http://itactechday2011.eventbrite.com/
Mon May 16 12:45:14 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
I'm not sure about mov specifically, but VLC for iPad handles most formats...
Mon May 16 13:41:27 +0000 2011
Replying to @redwards7
Will do! \(She's the one who suggested me for this gig\.\)
Mon May 16 13:43:26 +0000 2011
Hmmm. I inadvertently used one of the i-words and got no bot response. Wonder what that's about.
Mon May 16 13:56:37 +0000 2011
Come on, coffee, do your thing.
Mon May 16 14:01:50 +0000 2011
Replying to @nickmirzoeff
Oh, enormously so. Amazing what stress can do!
Mon May 16 15:46:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @jaysavage
Hey, it was great meeting you, too! You definitely had your hands full; I'm sure we'll get to talk more another time.
Mon May 16 23:34:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @mickimcgee
Thank you so much! I had a fabulous time, and was so happy to get the opportunity to talk with such great folks at Fordham!
Mon May 16 23:53:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @mickimcgee
Ha! I hope it helps. Sometimes it's nice to have somebody come in and be, um, blunt.
Tue May 17 00:05:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Hang in there - I'm thinking about you!
Tue May 17 01:42:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
I like GoodReader over iAnnotate. I also use the heck out of PlainText. Also: Office2 HD, VLC, Read It Later \(or Instapaper\) +
Tue May 17 22:03:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
NYer, if you subscribe, ABC Player, PBS, NPR, AJE Live.
Tue May 17 22:05:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Oh yeah, and: Flipboard, and I'm just now getting NYPL's Biblion.
Tue May 17 22:08:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
I was a solid Instapaper user until a pal convinced me to try Read It Later. The interface is definitely nicer but I'm not yet sold.
Wed May 18 01:40:23 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
al-Jazeera, definitely.
Wed May 18 01:41:08 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall, @dancohen and @triproftri
This whole conversation is mostly making me realize that I AM OLDER THAN EVERYONE.
Wed May 18 02:39:14 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall, @dancohen and @triproftri
Okay, if that was a Shangri-Las reference, I'M NOT THAT OLD.
Wed May 18 02:40:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall, @dancohen and @triproftri
Oh, crud. But I'm less younger than that than I thought. Thanks, Google.
Wed May 18 02:41:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall, @dancohen and @triproftri
Absolutely. Also, a friend posted a Eurythmics video on her FB page today, and I was shocked to realize+
Wed May 18 02:42:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall, @dancohen and @triproftri
how utterly pop it feels today, when it was soooo edgy. Back in the day. When I was not quite cool.
Wed May 18 02:43:02 +0000 2011
How much do I love Hendrik Hertzberg's use of the term "man-on-woman marriage" in this week's New Yorker? A lot.
Wed May 18 23:22:12 +0000 2011
Word to the wise: you might want to wait until dinner's fully digested before attempting this week's NYer "Annals of Science" article.
Thu May 19 00:01:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
Yep. And he is not kidding when he says it's unsettling.
Thu May 19 00:04:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
Soylent Green! It's made out of human tissue grown in sheets in a lab and rolled into hamburger-like shapes!
Thu May 19 00:10:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @ayjay and @samplereality
For me it was the strips of goldfish flesh in a bath extracted from the blood of unborn cows. Who comes up with this?
Thu May 19 00:13:24 +0000 2011
Replying to @ayjay
**shiver**
Thu May 19 00:15:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself, @samplereality and @ayjay
The argument is that we're going to need more meat in 20 years than we can grow naturally, so...
Thu May 19 00:19:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself, @samplereality and @ayjay
But I feel like I need to run off and hide with some Michael Pollan.
Thu May 19 00:20:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality, @wynkenhimself and @ayjay
You'd think - but hey! Science!
Thu May 19 00:21:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @sheepeeh, @wynkenhimself, @samplereality and @ayjay
No, it's literally all about growing flesh in vitro.
Thu May 19 00:23:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Sending good thoughts your way...
Thu May 19 14:32:32 +0000 2011
I want an auto-reply function for FB messages: "Dear Friend: Thank you for contacting me! If your message is personal, I'll reply when +
Thu May 19 15:36:50 +0000 2011
I'm on FB next. If your message is professional, please send it to one of my email addresses, which are easily discoverable on the web! +
Thu May 19 15:36:54 +0000 2011
Your Friend, kfitz." Why is this not currently possible?
Thu May 19 15:36:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @jmittell
That sounds about right. But why otherwise perfectly professional folks go along with that remains a mystery to me!
Thu May 19 15:39:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @amandafrench
NICE.
Thu May 19 15:39:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @mznewman
Gah. Infuriating.
Thu May 19 15:39:52 +0000 2011
Replying to @plragde
Of course. But I'd think that autoreply will be necessary if they really want to take over the messaging market.
Thu May 19 15:40:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @BGCDML
Sad but true.
Thu May 19 15:41:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @amandafrench
LOL, literally.
Thu May 19 15:42:25 +0000 2011
Replying to @d_kompare
Ha.
Thu May 19 15:50:16 +0000 2011
Replying to @BGCDML
Indeed. I've seen uses of it in which I want to say "no you did not. I'm quite sure of it."
Thu May 19 15:51:45 +0000 2011
RT @mediacommons: An update on the AAUP report, "Sustaining Scholarly Publishing." http://fb.me/10cw0svSI
Thu May 19 22:47:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @moncia
We very literally could not have done it without you!
Fri May 20 03:36:13 +0000 2011
Replying to @MLAconvention
That's nuts.
Fri May 20 03:38:42 +0000 2011
Replying to @alicedaer
Congratulations! What a doll.
Fri May 20 03:45:47 +0000 2011
RT @MLAnews: Still time to vote at mla.org on this resolution abt the DREAM Act: http://www.mla.org/11resolutioncomm01
Fri May 20 12:47:09 +0000 2011
Finally getting a handle on an article revision that's been languishing on my to-do list. The second-to-last major task of my sabbatical!
Fri May 20 13:31:40 +0000 2011
Oh, but figuring out how to revise something to deal with an issue that seemed to escape your understanding feels good.
Fri May 20 13:55:36 +0000 2011
The Intergalactic Modern Language Association Style Guide, 42nd Edition. http://littleprofessor.typepad.com/the_little_professor/2011/05/the-intergalactic-modern-language-association-style-guide-42nd-edition.html
Sat May 21 13:02:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
If something about blogging is dead, it's only the term; the platform has become the core of internet-based publishing #cwcon
Sat May 21 13:43:17 +0000 2011
A-and there's the rain. I knew the weather was too good to last. #gettingsoggy
Sat May 21 20:04:57 +0000 2011
Replying to @emarsh
Enjoy it! It was gorgeous here earlier today, but we're now back to the rain we've been living with for about ten days.
Sat May 21 20:16:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
I will certainly hope so - we could use it!
Sat May 21 20:21:18 +0000 2011
It wasn't exactly the rapture, but it was a really really good sushi dinner.
Sat May 21 23:32:11 +0000 2011
Replying to @emarsh
Behold the power of suggestion!
Sat May 21 23:40:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
I went to Aki on your suggestion!
Sun May 22 00:20:40 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
Went for the early prix fixe. Quite nice! And definitely better than the end of the world.
Sun May 22 00:32:26 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
Fair enough!
Sun May 22 00:47:23 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
No kidding. I'm glad he's all over the tweaks and fixes, but I kinda wish he'd save them up a bit.
Sun May 22 17:05:35 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
PS: Nice use of "egads."
Sun May 22 17:06:02 +0000 2011
New post: Complexity http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/complexity/
Sun May 22 19:58:34 +0000 2011
Replying to @MoodyFred
The draft is up at the link in the blog post; not sure about the revised version yet.
Mon May 23 01:07:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Oh, good grief. Well, all's well and all that, but sheesh.
Mon May 23 12:23:20 +0000 2011
New post: Enough http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/enough/
Mon May 23 14:17:54 +0000 2011
Replying to @jenterysayers
Congratulations!
Mon May 23 15:03:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @pmhswe
It's really hard to let go of the idea of running!
Mon May 23 16:50:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
Thanks, to you and @loriemerson!
Mon May 23 19:38:08 +0000 2011
Replying to @kdettmar
Little Rock? That's some itinerary.
Mon May 23 23:05:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @kdettmar
Gah! I'm so sorry. Hope you make it to an appropriate destination soon.
Mon May 23 23:14:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @nmhouston and @rgfeal
Oh, that would be nice...
Mon May 23 23:15:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @nmhouston and @rgfeal
Only problem I have with defining "enough" in advance is the "more than I can chew" phenomenon. Tend to set ridic goals.
Mon May 23 23:32:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @bukuwawa
While you're at it, could you make everyone stop using "relatable"?
Tue May 24 00:24:26 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
This question is what laid the groundwork for MediaCommons; the change came when we decided we needed a network, not a press.
Tue May 24 15:44:24 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie
Well, that's sort of good news, I guess. Take care of yourself!
Tue May 24 15:46:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
Exactly.
Tue May 24 15:46:43 +0000 2011
Replying to @eymand and @samplereality
The issue for us was also valuing process and community over product.
Tue May 24 15:51:46 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @eymand
What I like to think of as maintaining reverse compatibility with an out-of-date but still in-use system \(i\.e\. T&P\).
Tue May 24 15:53:37 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie and @samplereality
Indeed. It's much the same in fields in the US in which journal impact factor is the arbiter of publication value.
Tue May 24 15:58:17 +0000 2011
Revising is hard.
Tue May 24 16:02:54 +0000 2011
There is a very odd yellow radiance emanating from the sky. I do not know what to make of it.
Tue May 24 17:03:39 +0000 2011
Replying to @kimonizer
That *must* be it.
Tue May 24 17:56:27 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah and @wynkenhimself
Sheesh, I was thinking I was immune. You mean to say that it just hasn't hit me yet?
Tue May 24 22:34:15 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself and @mmwwah
No, lots of @ today, but no emails. I suspect they're rolling it out gradually. Awesome.
Tue May 24 22:36:11 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself and @mmwwah
The call... it's going to be coming from upstairs! At some really annoying moment in the near future!
Tue May 24 22:40:38 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah and @wynkenhimself
Nope! There's no setting for it. Trust me, I tried.
Tue May 24 22:41:02 +0000 2011
Revision update: have marked all the spots where changes need to be made, with annotations describing the changes. Now the actual changing.
Wed May 25 13:27:55 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
Hey, with that many wives and mistresses to buy for, credit is crucial!
Wed May 25 13:29:04 +0000 2011
Replying to @briancroxall
Happy birthday, Brian! Have a great one. \(But ditto @GeorgeOnline & @wynkenhimself: not sure where the last decade went\!\)
Wed May 25 14:19:33 +0000 2011
First 25% of article now sucks 31% less. Not quite enough, but getting there!
Wed May 25 16:47:11 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality
Cool! \(But it's the Office of Scholarly Communication\.\)
Wed May 25 17:20:05 +0000 2011
I am hugely flattered \(& not a little humbled\) by @samplereality's hopes for the MLA Office of Scholarly Communication. http://www.samplereality.com/2011/05/25/the-digital-humanities-is-not-about-building-its-about-sharing/
Wed May 25 17:23:23 +0000 2011
Replying to @leoba
Nice, thanks!
Wed May 25 17:48:51 +0000 2011
Replying to @dougreside
Interesting. Though of course it's really the @mkirschenbaum etymology, which in turn is the @unsworth etymology...
Wed May 25 17:53:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @parezcoydigo
It's a new "feature"! It's been fun watching the ripple effect as it hits people's accounts - mostly bc it hasn't hit me yet.
Wed May 25 18:05:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @parezcoydigo
100% agreed. Except for the cranky. But that's only because I remain spared; cranky will follow shortly, I suspect.
Wed May 25 18:25:33 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Safe trip! It was great getting to see you here.
Wed May 25 18:59:01 +0000 2011
Have now revised 45% of article to be 63% better. \(There was a really bad patch in there\.\)
Wed May 25 19:21:13 +0000 2011
Replying to @kathiiberens and @samplereality
You people are going to make me blush. AGAIN.
Wed May 25 19:33:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @samplereality and @karikraus
I very much look forward to facilitating the peculiar!
Wed May 25 19:34:12 +0000 2011
Replying to @brettbobley
It's all about the metrics, man.
Wed May 25 19:41:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @johnmjones
And one really hopes that one goes the way of the "book in the bathtub" soon; it seems a pointless bit of safety theater.
Wed May 25 19:55:08 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Absolutely! Word count: 8463. Words that don't suck: 6491.
Wed May 25 20:55:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Love it. Go, engineer, go!
Wed May 25 21:17:33 +0000 2011
In a NISO/@internetarchive planning meeting on ebook bookmark and annotation standards at NYU today. #bkmk11
Thu May 26 14:16:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
Is it a private tweet? It might be a good thing!
Thu May 26 15:53:59 +0000 2011
Replying to @cscannella
\(By which I mean from someone's private stream, not a DM\.\)
Thu May 26 15:54:23 +0000 2011
RT @moncia: Enjoying some of the lingo in a tech convo that's way over my head: "graceful degradation," "fail robustly." Concepts I can use.
Thu May 26 17:04:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @JenHoward
I know; bummer. At least I'll see you in Baltimore.
Thu May 26 19:07:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @JenHoward
Me too. But somehow appropriate that the two are happening at once on opposite sides of the DC corridor.
Thu May 26 19:09:29 +0000 2011
Replying to @wynkenhimself, @jenhoward and @amandafrench
Alas, I'll be on my way to California Sunday afternoon...
Thu May 26 19:20:54 +0000 2011
Replying to @triproftri
Congratulations!
Fri May 27 22:11:24 +0000 2011
Revision complete. Article now sucks 47% less. On to the next project!
Sat May 28 18:36:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @chutry
One of the most brilliant things about Chrome: opening a new window gives you links to recently closed items.
Sat May 28 18:40:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
Once a Sagehen...
Sat May 28 18:50:31 +0000 2011
Replying to @chutry
Bummer. That's one of the reasons I rely so heavily on tabs; I've accidentally closed windows w/15 tabs & have been able to recover.
Sat May 28 20:14:02 +0000 2011
Two! Two! Two major tasks crossed off the to-do list today!
Sat May 28 21:56:21 +0000 2011
OK, one last productivity brag for the day. Two major things crossed off the to-do list, and: In! Box! Zero! No one send me anything to do.
Sat May 28 23:35:36 +0000 2011
Replying to @cjprender
Is sad, but true. Alas, if you could see what my next three weeks look like...
Sat May 28 23:43:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @cjprender
Now, however, goofing off begins. Plus beer.
Sat May 28 23:44:21 +0000 2011
RT @ftrain: Oh Franzen oh Franzen oh no oh why. OH GOD FRANZEN NO STOP IT FRANZEN PLEASE FRANZEN...oh. Oh, god. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/opinion/29franzen.html
Sun May 29 13:23:55 +0000 2011
Replying to @msbonn
Maria!!! So amazingly glad to hear from you here! Sending you all my best wishes!
Sun May 29 13:25:10 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
Oh, dear. Not me. No, no. I would never.
Sun May 29 13:34:26 +0000 2011
I am attempting to take a day "off." I believe that's what people call it, at least.
Sun May 29 13:38:17 +0000 2011
Replying to @jwolman
As my grandfather used to say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Sun May 29 13:47:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @captain_primate
I know, right? I've heard people talking about it, but I'm not quite sure how it works. Will experiment and advise.
Sun May 29 14:13:30 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
I can only imagine that I would. But I think I'm going to lie around and read today. Have... fun?
Sun May 29 14:14:20 +0000 2011
Replying to @rgfeal
There should be all of the above! Enjoy!
Sun May 29 14:17:12 +0000 2011
Amen. //MT @stevenbjohnson: Nothing acclimates the mind more quickly to the idea of an all e-book future than packing your house for a move.
Mon May 30 19:32:06 +0000 2011
Replying to @mariabustillos
Okay wow. Chills.
Mon May 30 20:18:31 +0000 2011
Oh no. Aura.
Mon May 30 20:49:09 +0000 2011
And it appears to be another ocular migraine. Bizarro aura, no real headache, super loopy. Excuse to spend the evening in bed, I guess.
Mon May 30 22:37:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
This is only the second one I've gotten; all my previous auras were followed immediately by the headache. Weird.
Mon May 30 22:43:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Good grief! Are you sure that's coming in from outside & not a busted pipe? \(Stupid question; I'm sure you're sure\.\)
Mon May 30 23:26:21 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
Oh, man. I hope it stops soon!
Mon May 30 23:28:47 +0000 2011
Replying to @mamamusings
Thanks for the link! And I'm definitely better today, despite a bit of a migraine hangover...
Tue May 31 10:54:45 +0000 2011
My MBAir has suddenly become unable to mount any .dmg file it downloads. This is becoming seriously inconvenient.
Tue May 31 13:27:51 +0000 2011
Have narrowed down the problem, but not in a good way. Downloaded the .dmg with the iMac, transferred to the MBAir, still can't open.
Tue May 31 13:32:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @midwinter_
I do, on CD/DVD. Which of course the MBAir does not possess. Will ponder a workaround.
Tue May 31 13:41:35 +0000 2011
Ugh, and software update has now failed. Begin to fear that the MBAir's SSD may be corrupted or worse.
Tue May 31 13:43:27 +0000 2011
SSD is indeed corrupted. This is the moment when the no-optical-drive thing becomes a liability.
Tue May 31 14:01:12 +0000 2011
I'm all for lifting the veil of secrecy on double-blind peer revew. But I believe this is a step in the wrong direction. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/05/31/american_economic_association_abandons_double_blind_journal_reviewing
Tue May 31 14:16:54 +0000 2011
That last tweet brought to you by my need to step back for a moment from my rapidly degenerating laptop situation.
Tue May 31 14:17:25 +0000 2011
WHY, oh why, do critical laptop problems always only creep up two days before a three week stint of total laptop dependency begins?
Tue May 31 14:42:09 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander
It will certainly have a greater chance of boosting fairness than will giving one set of participants full knowledge [+]
Tue May 31 14:50:54 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander
while keeping the other in the dark. The potential abuses of one-sided secrecy are far higher than double-blindedness.
Tue May 31 14:51:56 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander
Interesting question. I'd be surprised if that were a viable argument. How would single-blind create savings?
Tue May 31 14:58:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @sgsinclair
This one's on about 3.2 years, so I've probably worn out its welcome.
Tue May 31 15:03:53 +0000 2011
Replying to @sgsinclair
\(Congrats on the fabulous new gig, btw\!\)
Tue May 31 15:04:23 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Yeah, but the machine is 3.2 years old, so even the extended care of the apple will be of no use.
Tue May 31 15:05:05 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
And the most frustrating thing is that I only need it to live until July, when it will be supplanted by an employer-owned machine.
Tue May 31 15:05:47 +0000 2011
Updates: attempt to restart MBAir w/OS X Remote Install failed. Now attempting to restart from clone of desktop drive so I can repair SSD.
Tue May 31 15:08:27 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander
I would not be terribly surprised to hear that as well.
Tue May 31 15:11:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
Yeah, me too. iPad will not suffice for three weeks, I fear.
Tue May 31 15:11:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @CatinStack
Huge news, and well-deserved congratulations!
Tue May 31 15:12:01 +0000 2011
Booting from clone worked. Running Disk Utility worked. Disk repairs claim to have worked. Now repairing permissions before trying reboot.
Tue May 31 15:14:24 +0000 2011
Replying to @acavender
Thank you!
Tue May 31 15:15:50 +0000 2011
PS: If this works, I encourage everyone to install Carbon Copy Cloner and make a donation to its developer, who will have saved my bacon.
Tue May 31 15:18:54 +0000 2011
Reboot successful. Now attempting the software updates that uncovered the problem in the first place.
Tue May 31 15:21:53 +0000 2011
Success. Not only is everything working like it's supposed to, but I seem to have recovered some speed that I'd lost of late.
Tue May 31 15:29:57 +0000 2011
Still somewhat afraid to breathe, though.
Tue May 31 15:30:24 +0000 2011
Replying to @tcarmody
No kidding. And all my backup paranoia now seems utterly justified.
Tue May 31 15:32:00 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander and @jtheibault
I think the assumption is the other way - that reviewers will Google author identity. Less sure about the other.
Tue May 31 15:43:02 +0000 2011
Replying to @BryanAlexander and @jtheibault
Nonetheless, you know which way I vote on this.
Tue May 31 15:43:12 +0000 2011
Replying to @mmwwah
No, everything's working. I'm just in a bit of disbelief.
Tue May 31 15:43:49 +0000 2011
Replying to @nowviskie
Good lord.
Tue May 31 16:26:47 +0000 2011
Replying to @sivavaid
You could show up and say ANYTHING.
Wed Jun 01 01:40:55 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
Apparently there's a setting. But I'm mostly fascinated by the fact that that still hasn't happened to me!
Wed Jun 01 01:41:41 +0000 2011
Replying to @nancybaym
Okay, that's infuriating.
Wed Jun 01 01:42:23 +0000 2011
Sony pulled the trailer for Fincher's Girl w/Dragon Tattoo off YouTube based on a copyright claim. They do realize trailers are ads, right?
Wed Jun 01 01:50:07 +0000 2011
Replying to @mattthomas
It's down now, with the big "copyright claim" notice. Maybe they did both, in which case, bravo.
Wed Jun 01 01:53:44 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
How the university can and should take responsibility for ensuring that scholarly communication has a \(non\-extortive\) future.
Wed Jun 01 01:58:22 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
That's fabulous. I did mean the response seriously, though. If current sch comm practices are bankrupting uni libraries, unis must +
Wed Jun 01 02:05:28 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
think seriously about new models, but those new models won't come without uni investment. I'm thinking of sch comm as a part of +
Wed Jun 01 02:06:19 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
the university infrastructure as necessary as the library, the faculty, the buildings. How can universities take ownership?
Wed Jun 01 02:07:20 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
Those are absolutely the *slightly* more than $64,000 questions, indeed.
Wed Jun 01 02:11:13 +0000 2011
Replying to @surlyF
Gives one chills.